Posts tagged gowalla
Beta Test This! Gowalla for Android
Feb 21st
We’re finding that many of our readers and twitter followers love to try out new applications. Any time we mention a developer is looking for feedback or insight into their application(s), you guys seem to jump all over it. Here’s another one, and its a pretty big title – Gowalla.
Gowalla is a location-based social networking game that seems to be picking up quite a bit of steam. Many liken it to foursquare in how it lets users to checkin to places, share locations, experiences, and pick up stamps for their ‘passport’. I downloaded Gowalla earlier this morning and can already see myself getting addicted to it. However, I am not certain I will be integrating twitter into it just yet. I don’t wanna flood the feed with all the places I visit around town.
Reading through the Gowalla blog, it sounds like the developers are pretty big on Android. Official representative Josh Williams posted a short blurb on the status of the app where he says, “…Our goal has been to do this right and provide a premium experience on the Android platform. We don’t want it to play second fiddle to the iPhone.”
If beta testing and social networking games are your thing, then I would recommend heading to http://static.gowalla.com/gowalla-android-20100212.apk from your Android handset. You can also scan the barcode below with your Android phone and get there too.
Thanks for the heads up Wes!
Download Gowalla
Might We Suggest…
Location, Location, Location: 5 Big Predictions for 2010
Dec 31st
GPS-aware mobile devices have become commonplace, which means connecting the dots between what you’re doing and where you’re doing it is easier than ever.
In 2009, location-sharing applications finally emerged in user-friendly formats, altering the way we think about where we are and helping us understand more of the meaning behind the data in aggregate.
Technology early adopters showed a predilection towards mobile location-based games, discovering that check-ins could mean something and that being the mayor of a venue might earn them a free drink. Now that businesses are actively exploring the opportunities that these location-aware services provide, we’ll see location matter more than ever in 2010.
1. Facebook Status Updates Will Become Location-Aware
The writing is on the wall. Facebook is the world’s largest social network, and for the first time ever it was the most trafficked web site on Christmas day in the United States. If anyone is poised to make a big move in the location-space in the new year its Facebook.
Facebook is already encouraging members to be more open. They made a bold and controversial move to alter the default settings around status updates in the hopes of making more Facebook updates public and searchable.
In the same spirit of openness, Facebook would certainly profit by implementing opt-in location-aware status updates. Knowing where your Facebook friends are grabbing a cup of coffee or catching a flick is a just as important, if not more so, than knowing that they’re doing it. So in much the same way that Foursquare shows you check-ins from friends and people checked in at venues, Facebook could provide context around status updates in the wild, but on a much grander scale.
2. A Popular LBS App Will Be Acquired
Once considered merely novelty apps, location-based mobile applications and games have demonstrated clear value in 2009. Mobile and web users have finally demonstrated that they’re interested in sharing their locations (in the form of places or venues as opposed to lat/longs). With the right privacy settings or gaming incentives, services are catering to businesses who are now offering location-based deals, and aggregating data around where people congregate is becoming increasingly desirable.
When those factors are combined with the crop of applications who get location-sharing right, and an economy on the upswing, you get an environment ripe for acquisitions.
So, who looks good for acquisition? Loopt. While Loopt is still struggling to make up ground in the blogosphere after losing buzz to newcomers with a focus on gaming, like Foursquare and Gowalla, the company has made huge improvements to their iPhone app (and introduced BlackBerry and Android apps).
Loopt has even adopted a check-in model, added tips to place pages, and will explore additional gaming functionality as well. In fact, their recent acquisition of GraffitiGeo is what gave rise to the new Tips functionality. Since GraffitiGeo also includes badges and “Street Cred” to measure identity and encourage participation, you can certainly expect similar elements to make their way into Loopt in 2010. Clearly the Loopt of today is drastically different from the Loopt of years past.
What makes Loopt extremely attractive, however, is their massive user base which includes millions across more than 100 different mobile devices. Loopt dwarfs the competition in this arena.
And who will be in an aquiring mood? Two big companies come to mind: Google and Microsoft.
When looking at the events of the last year, Google has shown clear interest in location, especially with the introduction of Latitude, which bears a striking resemblance to previous iterations of Loopt (i.e., primarily map based, and not place-specific).
Unfortunately, Google is already way behind in the location space. Even with the addition of location history and friend alerts, Latitude is lackluster and still without a native iPhone app. But, Google has shown a propensity of late towards acquiring companies that give them a competitive advantage in a yet untapped space.
Whether or not Google buys Loopt, everything points towards Google taking big leaps on the location front in 2010. We know they were interested in buying Yelp, and we know that they’re more actively trying to expose their Place Pages product, even encouraging locales to use QR code window decals so patrons can look up information on that particular venue on the spot (and perhaps check-in at a later date?). It’s certainly not a stretch then to assume that Google is interested in further assimilating the Latitude and Place Pages products into a more full-fledged location and recommendation service centered around places. An acquisition like Loopt would help them connect the dots much faster.
Microsoft could also make a play to become recognizable in the location space. They’ve yet to make a splash, but they do have an excellent maps application (especially as a part of their Bing iPhone app), and they tend to try and compete with Google at every possible juncture.
One company that we probably won’t see get snatched up in 2010 is Foursquare. They’re currently riding high on buzz, building up a user base in populous metros, and looking to expand worldwide. While they may be ripe for acquisition, history tells us that Foursquare’s co-founders will want to stay independent. Their previous product, Dodgeball — a mobile location-based game ahead of its time — was acquired by Google and all but ignored until its final demise.
We have noticed that Foursquare and Twitter have become quite close, most likely because Jack Dorsey, Twitter’s creater, is an investor, so we do expect more synergies to develop between the two companies in the coming year.
3. Twitter Will Build Their Own LBS app
In 2009 Twitter beefed up their product. Deciding that some things shouldn’t be left to third-party developers, Twitter modified their simple yet powerful platform in a few unexpected ways. We’ve seen the addition of a formal standard for retweets, powerful new Twitter Lists functionality, and even a mobile client of their own. In 2010, we expect that Twitter will continue down this path and build a location app of their own.
Twitter’s already laid the foundation when it comes to location. In September Twitter became location-aware, with opt-in settings enabling Twitterers to tag their tweets with their location. Then in November, Twitter announced a Trends API, opening up trending data specific to locations (i.e., trending places) to developers.
Twitter’s recent acquisition of Mixer Labs is the most telling indication that they’re exploring building their own location-aware applications. Mixer Labs, who’s popular GeoAPI service does reverse geocoding to identify places, supports a places finder for the 16 million business-strong database, and includes media layers to add context — think Flickr photos, YouTube videos, even Foursquare check-ins — to neighborhoods.
Twitter will certainly pass along this souped-up geo offering to developers at a cost similar to GeoAPI’s pricing scheme, but they could also be planning to build their own app for even more lucrative opportunities.
One such application we envision would be a feature addition that is rolled up into Twitter’s business services. So as a paying business user of Twitter, your dashboard view could show you valuable context around location-aware tweets happening in or near your place of business.
4. Location Sharing Will Become Ubiquitous
In some ways location is already ubiquitous. It’s already built in to most of our favorite applications. When we use Yelp’s mobile app, we can find nearby restaurants. If we share our location with Flixster on our mobile devices, the app shows us movies and theaters that are within a certain radius. Even Evernote tags notes created on mobile devices with location metadata so that if you want to find notes you created in a certain place, you can.
Location is relevant in almost any equation, which means applications, web sites, and services will push to integrate even more location functionality. A Google search for something like “food” already returns local place results based on your IP address. Are we that far off from the same search returning both places as well as real-time tweets from people nearby on food? The answer to that question is a definite no.
As we move into 2010, the value of shared location data will only be as strong as the quantity of people sharing location-aware updates. Twitter, Foursquare, Loopt, Gowalla, Google and potentially Facebook will help contribute to the tide that pushes more people into the sea of location-sharing.
5. Location Will Be Both Media Darling and Cautionary Tale
Those of us who have been using Twitter for some time have followed the course of the micro medium’s macro coverage in the news. Before 2009, and even up through the first few months of the year, Twitter was gravely misunderstood by the mainstream media.
One thing was apparent: Twitter was changing the pace of news, becoming the platform for citizen journalism, usurping the entertainment media’s hold over celebrity news, and evolving into a medium for businesses to set up shop.
As such, the media came a calling, at first with extreme consternation and disdain. But as the stories continued to flood in, they started appearing as headline and front-page stories. Eventually the mainstream media changed their tone. Expect the same course of events to follow the location-based service and application space in 2010. Location will make headlines in 2010.
It’s the nature of the mainstream media to show up late to the party, so while Foursquare and Gowalla continue to make headlines in the blogosphere, those services aren’t getting the same coverage in newspapers or airplay on TV. This will change in 2010. We can expect location-sharing to be both mocked and celebrated in the new year. Stories of location-sharing gone wrong will be described as cautionary tales for those who live their lives too openly. Those stories will be followed by general interest pieces on the value of connecting through location, or success stories highlighting businesses able to capitalize on location-based services.
Image courtesy of iStockphoto, allsee
Reviews: Android, Evernote, Facebook, Flickr, Flixster, Foursquare, Google, Gowalla, Twitter, Yelp, YouTube, iStockphoto
Tags: 2010, facebook, foursquare, geolocation, Google, gowalla, location, location sharing, loopt, Mobile 2.0
Facebook CEO Takes One for the Team and Embraces New Privacy Settings
Dec 11th
While privacy watchdogs, security firms and users digest the implications of Facebook’s new privacy settings, at least one high-profile individual is embracing them: Facebook Founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg.
TrueSlant seems to have been first to notice that the usually very private Zuckerberg has opened up his profile so that anyone can see his wall, photos and events. While their report speculates that perhaps Zuckerberg doesn’t understand the new settings, it’s far more likely that he’s simply opened up to try and show everyone else that it’s okay to do so.
So what’s in Zuck’s profile? Not too much of interest that you wouldn’t expect from your typical twenty-something billionaire. The CEO’s wall reveals he actively uses the site’s commenting and “like” features. His photo album is far from scandalous, although Gawker has rounded up their “favorite” images. And he’s apparently a fan of Lady GaGa, The Oprah Winfrey Show and location-sharing service Gowalla.
Opening up is certainly a smart, if not highly calculated, move by Zuckerberg, who would look hypocritical in saying that the site is no longer simply about friend connections while simultaneously keeping his profile limited to his friends. That said, it’s unlikely that the move will do much to convince those skeptical of Facebook’s intentions that opening up is really in your best interest.
How have you adjusted your privacy settings since the new rollout? Let us know in the comments.
[img credit: Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook Page]
Reviews: Facebook, Gowalla
Tags: facebook, gowalla, Lady Gaga, mark zuckerberg, Oprah winfrey, privacy
Location Is The Missing Link Between Social Networks And The Real World
Nov 18th
Imagine a world where you sit at your computer and you never go outside. Where you never see another human being. This is the world that sites like Google and Facebook want you to live in.
Though they’d never admit to such a thing, the reasoning should be obvious: The longer you’re at your computer, the more time you’re spending on their sites. The more time your spending on their sites, the more ads you’re being served. The more ads being served, the more money they are earning. No matter why these sites originally started, or what features they add, that is, quite literally, the bottom line. They’d have us strapped to a chair with our eyes taped open like Alex in A Clockwork Orange, if they could. The only difference is that we’d have a contraption on our arms to allow us to click on the ads being shown every so often.
Thankfully, we don’t quite live in that world yet. And there are a couple factors pushing us the opposite way from that. Mobile devices are the biggest one. But even that is still just a screen. You may not be chained to a desk using it, but as plenty of people with an iPhone will tell you, you may end staring at this screen even more than you do a desktop or laptop monitor throughout a day. But there’s another up and coming factor working against our screen slavery: Location.
Social networking has been perhaps the most popular trend on the Internet over the past several years. At first the term was ironic. “Social networking” was anything but social in the traditional sense. But over time, we’ve grown accustomed to the idea that you can do social activities such as play games, collaborate on work, and talk, online. And in fact, many times it’s even more convenient than doing it in person. It’s social, but it’s a different kind of social.
Ever since the term was born, countless people have debated the implications of taking social interactions virtual. At one point or another I’m sure that it has been said that it would be both the downfall of mankind, and the thing that would bring the planet together. The truth is that social networking, while great in many respects, does not fulfill a fundamental human desire: To be in the actual presence of other people.
If you’ll allow me to be embarrassingly obvious for a second: Sitting in a chat room all day, even if all of your friends are in it as well, is not the same as being in the same physical room with them. Even if you all are having great discussions in the chat room, and not saying a word when you’re hanging out with one another, there is just something that’s different. Something that social networking will never be able to replace.
That’s where location comes in. It has the power to be the bridge between social networking and actual social interaction. We’re already seeing the very early signs of this with services like Foursquare, Gowalla, Loopt, Brightkite, and Google Latitude, to varying degrees.
To the masses, most of these services still either don’t make sense, or are way too creepy. Social networks used to be thought of in the same way. This will change.
The people who do use these services likely have at least one story about a situation where a friend saw where they were, or where they planned to be, and showed up to meet up. Some have many of these stories. And for some of us in cities where these services are popular, this happens just about everyday. And it’s really quite amazing.
Is it annoying if a friend shows up if you want to be alone or don’t want to see them? Of course. But that’s why it’s important that you’re in control of what location information you are sending out. Is it creepy if a stranger shows up to meet you somewhere? Of course, but that’s why privacy settings are so important.
Make no mistake, there are hurdles to location-based services gaining widespread acceptance. But the upside of it far outweighs the downside. And with that the case, these types of services are ripe to take off.
At the core level, using a social network to facilitate actual social interaction just seems to make sense. Though I poked fun at them in the intro of this post, don’t think that Facebook doesn’t recognize this. In some ways they already do this through their popular events offering. But anything they do with location — which it should be no surprise, they are working on — will go far beyond this. When you have a social graph with over 300 million users and you add a realtime location component into the mix, it’s going to change things.
I remember the first time I used sites like Facebook, MySpace, and Friendster (back in the day) to find people that I went to high school with who I hadn’t talked to in years. It was a little weird, but also in some ways exciting. Imagine that transfered into the real world. Maybe you’re in a city with a person you went to high school with, but hadn’t talked to in years. It’s unlikely that the two of you were ever run into each other randomly, but maybe you can get pinged by Facebook location when they’re nearby. Maybe neither of you want to meet, and that’s fine. But maybe you do.
The word we keep hearing over and over again for such situations is “serendipity,” but really it’s not. None of this needs to be left up to chance. It’s simply an extension of social networking into the real world.
Another social network, Twitter, is already in hot pursuit of such functionality. Any day now, the service will turn on its geolocation service which will both allow you to send tweets with your location tacked on, and allow you to pass in location information from other services, like Foursquare. As a service with tens of millions of users, Twitter will be the first massive test of location as an extension of social networking.
It may be a while before users start truly taking advantage of it since it is an opt-in feature. But eventually, I believe we’ll see more and more users opt-in to be able to use third-party clients like Birdfeed which let them choose which tweets to attach their location to and let people know where they are.
And beyond individual user data, this location data will be very interesting as an aggregate. Undoubtedly people will use things like Twitter’s geolocation APIs to make services that can show where people are flocking to in realtime. This is the next step for what services like SocialGreat are doing with location data, showing hot spots in towns. And we already know that Twitter is planning to use the data to tailor its trending topics to show the hot things being tweeted about in specific places.
Social networking up until this point has been great. But it’s also really a bit odd. The core concept is still to gather your friends in a virtual construct, while the companies behind these constructs convince you to hang out in them as much as possible. Instead, they should be using the interesting social data they have to help you connect in other places as well. That’s what makes Facebook Connect is so powerful. But that doesn’t extend to the real world yet. But with location, it could. And that’s exciting.
We’ll be discussing this and other topics at our Realtime CrunchUp this Friday in San Francisco.
[images: MGM and Warner Brothers]
Crunch Network: CrunchGear drool over the sexiest new gadgets and hardware.
HashCeratops Aims To Formally Add Place Tagging To The Twitter Stream
Oct 27th
Twitter is on the verge of rolling out its Geolocation API (actually, it’s already partially rolled out). That feature should be a boon to location-based services which can now send their location information back to Twitter and vice versa. But these locations will just be coordinates, it won’t be like Foursquare or Gowalla where you check in to actual places to tag your location. A new group aims to merge the ideas.
HashCeratops (yes, that’s really the name) is a group being led by Buzzd, the service that finds hot places in cities based on other location services. One main feed Buzzd looks to for its data is the Twitter stream. The problem is that without a standard for naming locations, it can be hard to parse tweets to find out exactly where people are. Hence, HashCeratops. Read the rest of this entry »

We knew this move was coming, but it doesn’t make it any less monumental for the rapidly rising location-based industry.







If you’ve tuned in previously, you’ll know we throw out a 
